Curtis v. . Hudson Valley Railway Company

107 N.E. 1075 | NY | 1915

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., CHASE, HOGAN, MILLER and CARDOZO, JJ.; HISCOCK, J., dissents on the ground that improper evidence was received that the whistle did not blow and concerning the earnings of the decedent.