History
  • No items yet
midpage
Curtis Michael Richendollar, Cross-Appellant v. Diamond M Drilling Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee, and Baker Shipyards, Inc.
790 F.2d 442
5th Cir.
1986
Check Treatment

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion March 5, 1986, 5 Cir., 1986, 784 F.2d 580)

Before CLARK, Chief Judge, GEE, RUBIN, REAVLEY, POLITZ, RANDALL, JOHNSON, WILLIAMS, GARWOOD, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, HILL, and JONES, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc without oral argument. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Case Details

Case Name: Curtis Michael Richendollar, Cross-Appellant v. Diamond M Drilling Company, Inc., Cross-Appellee, and Baker Shipyards, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: May 28, 1986
Citation: 790 F.2d 442
Docket Number: 84-2492
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.