Curry v. State, 568 So. 2d 1346

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED. See Cobb v. State, 567 So.2d 554 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990); Huff v. State, 566 So.2d 945 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990). Fla.R.App.P. 9.315(a). We certify the following question to the supreme court as one of great public importance:

DOES A JEOPARDY VIOLATION RESULT FROM THE IMPOSITION OF A PROBATIONARY SPLIT SENTENCE WHEN THE LEGISLATURE HAS NOT EXPLICITLY AUTHORIZED THAT DISPOSITION IN THE SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES FOR § 921.087, FLA. STAT.?

SHIVERS, C.J., and SMITH and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Curry v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Nov 6, 1990

Citations: 568 So. 2d 1346; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 8601; 1990 WL 175054; No. 90-2392

Docket Number: No. 90-2392

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.