History
  • No items yet
midpage
Curley v. Heffernan
269 A.D. 953
N.Y. App. Div.
1945
Check Treatment

Order reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and the matter remitted to Special Term so that the Justice who heard the matter may make findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to section 440 of the Civil Practice Act and, if need be, for the purpose of taking further proof to. facilitate the making of such findings and conclusions. Close, P. J., Carswell and Lewis, JJ., concur; Johnston, J., dissents and votes to affirm, with the following memorandum: The Special Term passed upon all objections urged by petitioner except the one alleging that the subscribing witness had set forth the wrong election district. The Special Term, after taking proof on all the other objections, found that the nominating petition contained 5,955 valid signatures, subject to checking to ascertain how many of the 5,955 signatories had registered. The witness McCormack, called by the respondent, testified that of the 5,955 signatories, 2,694 had not registered. Therefore, the Special Term’s findings that there were only 3,261 valid signatures on the nominating petition and that the petition was invalid are correct and the order should be affirmed; Hagarty, J., not voting.

Case Details

Case Name: Curley v. Heffernan
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 22, 1945
Citation: 269 A.D. 953
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.