History
  • No items yet
midpage
Curley v. Harper & Bros.
296 N.Y.S. 988
N.Y. App. Div.
1937
Check Treatment

Order, so far as appealed from, affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements. *850on the ground that under the unusual circumstances herein it cannot be said that the Special Term improperly exercised its discretion. Present — Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.; O’Malley and Dore, JJ., dissent and vote for reversal on the authority of Singer v. New York Times Co. (74 App. Div. 380); Kuster v. New York Times Co. (79 id. 39).

Case Details

Case Name: Curley v. Harper & Bros.
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 23, 1937
Citation: 296 N.Y.S. 988
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.