History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cureton v. Clopton
99 Ga. 616
Ga.
1896
Check Treatment
Atkinson, J.

The evidence, though clearly decidedly conflicting, warranted the verdict. Some of the alleged newly discovered evidence was evidently within the knowledge of the defendant ■at the time of the trial, and all of it might have been obtained before that time by the exercise of proper diligence. As a whole,. it would not probably change the result. Judgment affirmed.

B. T. Brock, T. J. Lumpkin and McGuichen & Shit-mate, for plaintiff in error. .W. Ü. &J. P.Jacoway, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Cureton v. Clopton
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Oct 26, 1896
Citation: 99 Ga. 616
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.