| Ky. Ct. App. | Jan 28, 1944
Reversing.
The appellant was convicted of shooting into a church, an offense denounced by Subsection 4 of KRS
He urges as grounds for reversal that his demurrer to the indictment should have been sustained; that the evidence for the Commonwealth was not sufficient to take the case to the jury; and that the Court erred in its instructions. *465
In view of our agreement with the last of these contentions, we shall dispose of the others by merely stating that the indictment, while ineptly drawn, was, in our opinion, sufficient to apprise appellant of the statutory crime with which he was charged (Adkins v. Commonwealth,
The indictment named only the appellant, and charged him with having fired the shots. Nevertheless, the Court, in a second instruction, authorized his conviction if the jury believed that he had aided and abetted another in firing them. This was clearly erroneous, since one may not be convicted of aiding and abetting another in the commission of a crime, unless he is charged with having done so, or unless the indictment names two or more persons as the perpetrators. Bailey v. Commonwealth,
Judgment reversed.