History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cunningham v. Strom
8 Ga. App. 87
Ga. Ct. App.
1910
Check Treatment
Hill, C. J.

This case is here on a direct bill of exceptions in which the only valid assignment of error is that the finding of the court, without the intervention of a jury, is without any evidence to support it. No proper brief of the written and oral evidence is in the bill of exceptions or made a part of the record. What purports to be a brief is all the evidence in extenso, both material and immaterial, and also all the testimony which the court excluded from evidence; and as the only questions made depend upon a consideration of the evidence, the judgment of the lower court must be affirmed. Civil Code, §§ 5528, 5529; Albany Northern Ry. Co. v. Wheeler, 6 Ga. App. 270 (64 S. E. 1114); Huntley Mfg. Co. v. Nixon Grocery Co., 6 Ga. App. 46 (64 S. E. 79), and cases cited. • ' Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Cunningham v. Strom
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Jul 19, 1910
Citation: 8 Ga. App. 87
Docket Number: 2553
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.