History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cunningham v. State
471 S.W.2d 777
Ark.
1971
Check Treatment
Conley Byrd, Justice.

The only point raised in this appeaJ from the trial court’s denial of appellant Rudolph Cunningham’s post conviction relief is the assertion that he was denied a' fair trial because the deputy prosecuting attorney threatened one of the State’s witnesses with perjury if she did not tell the truth. The witness, a relative of petitioner, testified that though the threat was made, she only told the truth and nothing but the truth.

We find no merit in the contention.

Affirmed.

Fogleman, J., not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: Cunningham v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Oct 25, 1971
Citation: 471 S.W.2d 777
Docket Number: 5650
Court Abbreviation: Ark.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.