midpage

Cunningham v. DorseyCunningham v. Dorsey

California Supreme Court
Jul 1, 1856
Reporters:
Before:
Heydenfeldt
The opinion of the Court was delivered by Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt.

Mr. Chief Justice ‍‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‍Murray concurred.

The third instruction given by the District Court, at the request of the plaintiff, is clearly erroneous. The true rule of damages is ‍‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‍the value of the labor performed, and the amount of profit which could fairly have been derived from the labor left unperformed by the ‍‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‍act of the defendants. Although afterwards, at the defendants’ request, the Court laid down the correct rule, yet it is impossible to say that ‍‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‍the erroneous instruction first given had no influence upon the jury. Both stood together and were of equal force, and we cannot by computation ‍‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌‌‌​​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌‌​‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​​​‌​​​‌‌​​‍ascertain by which one the jury was controlled.

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Cunningham v. Dorsey
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 1, 1856
Citation: 6 Cal. 19
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
Log In