History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cummings v. Cummings
8 Watts 366
Pa.
1839
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The presumption from a mother’s maintenance of her child, whatever be the means of either, is that she furnished *367it as a gift. If the child has nothing to recur to, the presumption is irresistible; and if it even has an estate, her omission to have it applied by a guardian, is equally so. Perhaps one case could not be picked out of a thousand, in which the presumption would not accord with the fact. They who would set bounds to the generosity of a mother, know, but little about the impulses of such a parent. The presumption, therefore, being legitimately founded in the natural course of things, prevails till it is rebutted; and as the plaintiff did not offer a prima facie case, the evidence was rightly excluded.

Judgment affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Cummings v. Cummings
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jul 15, 1839
Citation: 8 Watts 366
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.