History
  • No items yet
midpage
Crystal v. State
672 So. 2d 632
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1996
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant was sentenced on September 21, 1995, for several 1994 offenses, and for violation of a probation order for two robbery offenses committed by appellant in 1991. A sentencing guidelines scoresheet was prepared, based on the 1994 guidelines, which listed a 1994 burglary as the primary offense, and the 1991 robberies and other offenses as additional offenses, and sentence was imposed based on the scoresheet. The appellant contends, and the state agrees, that it was error to sentence appellant for offenses committed prior to January 1, 1994, using a 1994 guidelines scoresheet. It is therefore necessary to vacate appellant’s sentences and remand for resentencing. See Heath v. State, 656 So.2d 527 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995), and Tubwell v. State, 661 So.2d 380 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995).

The sentences appealed are VACATED and this cause is REMANDED for resen-tencing.

MINER and WEBSTER, JJ., and SMITH, Senior Judge, concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Crystal v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Apr 26, 1996
Citation: 672 So. 2d 632
Docket Number: No. 95-3568
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.