Cruz v. WalshCruz v. Walsh
We confirm. Petitioner‘s plea of guilty to the charge of engaging in an unauthorized exchange precludes him from challenging the evidence supporting the determination of guilt with respect to that charge (see Matter of Weems v Fischer, 82 AD3d 1454, 1455 [2011]; Matter of Harrison v Selsky, 2 AD3d 1232, 1232-1233 [2003]). Moreover, the detailed misbehavior report,
Mercure, J.P., Rose, Kavanagh, McCarthy and Garry, JJ., concur.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.