midpage

Cruz v. New York City Housing AuthorityCruz v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 1, 1993
Versions:192 A.D.2d 322
595 N.Y.S.2d 449
1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3232

—Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anita Florio, J.), entered August 13, 1992, which, inter alia, denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs

Plaintiff’s failure to supply the name of a notice witness was inadvertent, and defendant is not prejudiced because it has been given a further opportunity to depose plaintiff. Therefore, there is no need to preclude introduction of the witness’ testimony at trial.

Summary judgment was properly denied since the witness’ affidavit concerning the substance that allegedly caused the plaintiff’s fall created a triable issue as to whether the defendant had actual or constructive notice. Concur — Carro, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Cruz v. New York City Housing Authority
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 1, 1993
Citations: 192 A.D.2d 322; 595 N.Y.S.2d 449; 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3232
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In