ERIC CRUZ, Respondent, v LUCIANO P. MARTINS, Appellant, and JESSICA GROCERY et al., Respondents.
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York
May 5, 2005
824 NYS2d 747
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs to the plaintiff-respondent.
In support of his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and all cross claims insofar as asserted against him, the defendant Luciano P. Martins failed to demonstrate a prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alonso v Branchinelli, 277 AD2d 408 [2000]). Thus, the motion was properly denied regardless of the sufficiency of the opposing papers (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851 [1985]). Miller, J.P., Ritter, Santucci and Lunn, JJ., concur.
