Cruikshank v. Cruickshank
115 N.J. Eq. 322 | N.J. | 1934
The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Advisory Master Matthews in the court of chancery.
For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Teenchaed, Paekee, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Hehee, Peeskie, Kays, Heteield, Deae, Wells, Dill, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.