History
  • No items yet
midpage
Crowson v. Cody
267 U.S. 579
SCOTUS
1925
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction upon the authority of section 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, sec. 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1, 5, 6; Ireland v. Woods, 246 U. S. 323, 328; Stadelman v. Miner, 246 U. S. 544, 546; Chicago Great Western R. R. Co. v. Basham, 249 U. S. 164, 165; Citizens’ Bank v. Opperman, 249 U. S. 448, 450. (See 266 U. S. 590.)

Case Details

Case Name: Crowson v. Cody
Court Name: Supreme Court of the United States
Date Published: Mar 2, 1925
Citation: 267 U.S. 579
Docket Number: No. 590
Court Abbreviation: SCOTUS
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.