midpage

Crowley v. Pinebrook, Inc.Crowley v. Pinebrook, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Jul 21, 2011
No. 10-2398
Versions:439 F. App'x 232
PER CURIAM:

Marilyn Crowley appeals the district court’s order * granting summary judgment and denying her claim that her employment was terminated in violation of Title VII, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e-2000e-17 (West Supp.2010) and the Jury System Improvement Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1875 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Crowley v. Pinebrook, Inc., No. 8:08-cv-03427-JKS, 2010 WL 4963004 (D.Md. Dec. 1, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Notes

The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006).

Case Details

Case Name: Crowley v. Pinebrook, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Date Published: Jul 21, 2011
Citations: 439 F. App'x 232; No. 10-2398
Docket Number: No. 10-2398
Court Abbreviation: 4th Cir.
Log In