Crouchman v. Motor City Elec. Co.

704 N.W.2d 75

Mich.

2005

Check Treatment

ROBERT THOMAS CROUCHMAN and SUGAR M. CROUCHMAN v. MOTOR CITY ELECTRIC COMPANY and CITIZENS INSURANCE COMPANY, and KEVIN JAMES WIECZOREK v. AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, a/k/a HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY

SC: 127871

Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

September 29, 2005

COA: 248419; Wayne CC: 01-112063-NI

Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice; Michael F. Cavanagh, Elizabeth A. Weaver, Marilyn Kelly, Maura D. Corrigan, Robert P. Young, Jr., Stephen J. Markman, Justices

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 28, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(G)(1), we direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action permitted by MCR 7.302(G)(1). The parties shall include among the issues to be addressed at oral argument whether the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that there is coverage where the automobile involved in the accident is not owned by the insured but is furnished to or available for regular use by the insured. The parties may file supplemental briefs within 28 days of the date of this order, but they should avoid submitting mere restatement of arguments in application papers.

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

September 29, 2005

Corbin R. Davis

Clerk