70 F. 334 | E.D. Va. | 1895
The Morgan is a three-masted schooner of 553 tons; W. W. Crossley, the libelant, master. She set sail from Hampton Roads, Avith a cargo of 1,038 tons of coal, about noon of the 24th of March, 1893, bound for New Haven, Conn. It grew foggy about 3 o’clock, but the fog partially lifted about 4 o’clock, when the schooner passed Cape Charles light. She was then sailing under her three lower sails, two topsails, and four jibs. After passing the Cape Charles lightship she took in the two topsails. The wind and fog afterwards increased until 7 o’clock, when the spanker and one of the jibs were taken in; and she then sailed with her foresail, mainsail, and three jibs up. After 7 o’clock p. m. there was a strong wind from S. S. W., and a heavy sea from S. E. and E. The fog was thick, and the vessel on a N. E. course, under sail, until nearly 9 o’clock p. m., when the wind became moderate and was so until 10:30, up to which time she had her lights up and burning, with a lookout stationed forward, sounding a fog horn, a seaman at the wheel, the mate on deck amidships (it being his watch), and also the captain. She had no mechanical fog horn. Before sails were taken in, — about 7, — the schooner had been making seven knots an hour. Afterwards, until 9, she made six knots. After 9 the wind moderated, and she made five knots. The proofs of the libelant show that at about 10:30 p. m. the captain, having previously gone down into the cabin to check off his course, was coming up on deck, when a steamer’s whistle Avas reported to Mm. This steamer proved to be the steam tug Hercules, Taylor, master, coming south on a course S. S. W., bound for Norfolk, having in toiv the barge Charter Oak on a 200-fathom hawser, the barge being without load, and moving light on the water. The tug’s lights Avere in place and burning. Her master was in the pilot house, in charge of her navigation, and at the same time blowing her fog whistle, and acting as lookout on the starboard side of the tug. A foreign-born young man was at the wheel, obeying the directions of the master. The foreman and engineer were on duty. These were the only persons on duty at the time on the tug. On the barge the master and a seaman were on
In the foregoing statement I have not gone with any detail into the incidental facts shown by the evidence. The tug was in fault in failing to stand by the schooner after the collision, as well as in other particulars not material to the decision of this case. The schooner was in fault in not having had on board and in not using a proper mechanical fog horn. By mechanical fog horn is meant one sounded by mechanical means, as distinguished from horns sounded from the human lungs. Both of these colliding vessels having been at fault, the damages resulting from the collision and the sinking of the schooner must be divided equally; the costs of suit to be paid by the respondent.