History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cross v. Prohaska
103 Neb. 146
Neb.
1919
Check Treatment
Rose, J.

This is an action to recover a commission of $500 for the sale of land. From a judgment on a verdict in favor of defendants, plaintiff has appealed.

The assignments of error are based on misconduct of a witness and of the jury. The evidence has not been preserved by a bill of exceptions, and without the evidence the merits of the assignments cannot be determined. What purports to be a bill of exceptions was filed in this court, but it was not allowed as *147such by the trial judge or authenticated by the clerk of the district court. It must therefore he disregarded on appeal. Dugger v. Smith, 94 Neb. 552; Gay v. Reynolds, 57 Neb. 194.

Apeirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Cross v. Prohaska
Court Name: Nebraska Supreme Court
Date Published: Feb 1, 1919
Citation: 103 Neb. 146
Docket Number: No. 20336
Court Abbreviation: Neb.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.