History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cross v. Hobson
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 367
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1804
Check Treatment
*Per Curiam.

The defendant can take nothing by his motion. In the cause of Caldwell v. Graham, decided in January term, 1803, we determined we would not help an insolvent who omitted to plead his discharge as he might have done.[1]

Motion denied.

See case of Shaw v. Wilmerden, 2 Cai. R. 38; Van Valkenbergh v. Dederick, 1 J. C 133; see Billings v. Skutt, 1 J. C. 105.

Case Details

Case Name: Cross v. Hobson
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 15, 1804
Citation: 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 367
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.