History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cross v. Cross
200 Ala. 21
Ala.
1917
Check Treatment

Suit by the wife against the husband for alimony alone. The substance of the bill is set out in the foregoing statement of the case, and need not be here repeated. It is quite clear from an unbroken line of authorities in this state that the bill has equity. Spafford v. Spafford, 74 So. 354;1 Johnson v. Johnson, 195 Ala. 641, 71 So. 415; Clisby v. Clisby,160 Ala. 572, 49 So. 445, 135 Am. St. Rep. 110; Murray v. Murray, 84 Ala. 363, 4 So. 239; Brady v. Brady, 144 Ala. 414,39 So. 237; Glover v. Glover, 16 Ala. 440.

The assignments of demurrer also appear in the statement of the case, and we think it clearly appears that the bill was not subject to any of the assignments interposed. It results that the decree of the court below overruling the demurrer will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and SAYRE, JJ., concur.

1 199 Ala. 300.

Case Details

Case Name: Cross v. Cross
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Apr 26, 1917
Citation: 200 Ala. 21
Docket Number: 6 Div. 490.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.