History
  • No items yet
midpage
Crosby v. Brantly
20 Ala. 287
Ala.
1852
Check Treatment
PHELAN, J.

The action below was on an open account, for a sum less than twenty dollars, and was brought to the Circuit Court by appeal. The judgment was by default, and the record does not show that any proof was made to the court of the correctness of the demand. This was an error, as this court has expressly decided, in Kenum v. Henderson, 6 Ala. 132, and Witherington v. Brantly, 18 ib. 197.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Crosby v. Brantly
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 15, 1852
Citation: 20 Ala. 287
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.