History
  • No items yet
midpage
Crooms v. State
32 S.E. 131
Ga.
1898
Check Treatment
Simmons, C. J.

There being no error of law complained of, and the-evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, there was no, error in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring. Accusation of simple larceny. Before Judge Boss. City court of Macon. October 20, 1898. Nottingham, & Polhill and J. B. Cooper, for plaintiff in error. Bobert Hodges, solicitor-general, contra.

Case Details

Case Name: Crooms v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Georgia
Date Published: Dec 15, 1898
Citation: 32 S.E. 131
Court Abbreviation: Ga.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.