History
  • No items yet
midpage
Crook v. Forsyth
30 Cal. 662
Cal.
1866
Check Treatment
By the Court, Shafter, J. :

A new trial was asked for below on the ground of the insufficiency of the evidence to justify the decision of the Court on the merits.

The burden of proof under the issues jóined was upon the *663defendant, and his testimony was so far inconsistent with itself that the Court, acting advisedly, could not, in our judgment, have come to any other conclusion than it did. There was a conflict in the testimony, and it was all the more fatal for being intestine.

Judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Sanderson expressed no opinion.

Case Details

Case Name: Crook v. Forsyth
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1866
Citation: 30 Cal. 662
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.