Cronin v. New York City Transit AuthorityCronin v. New York City Transit Authority
Versions:
Appeal from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Dominic R. Massaro, J.), entered May 27, 2014, which denied defendant‘s
The appeal is dismissed pursuant to the fugitive disentitlement doctrine because defendant absconded from parole supervision while his appeal was pending and has not returned (see People v Taveras, 10 NY3d 227 [2008]; People v Law, 12 AD3d 192 [1st Dept 2004]). Were we not dismissing the appeal, we would affirm, finding that the court properly exercised its discretion in determining that substantial justice dictated the denial of defendant‘s motion. Concur—Friedman, J.P., Saxe, Moskowitz, Gische and Kahn, JJ.