History
  • No items yet
midpage
Crole v. Thomas
17 Mo. 329
Mo.
1852
Check Treatment
Ryland, Judge,

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. In this case, the instructions which were given by the court to the jury, are so unintelligible that, in our opinion, the judgment below must be reversed. We have often said that instructions were designed ex vi termini to assist the jury under the law, to find properly the facts and issues in controversy. Therefore a few, plain, direct instructions, embracing the law of the case, will always aid a jury to come to correct conclusions. The court bad better give no instructions than such as mystify, confuse and involve the case in intricacy, thereby often misleading the jury instead of giving light to them. Improper instructions given to juries are the fruitful source of litigation in this court.

This judgment is reversed and the cause remanded;

the other judges concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Crole v. Thomas
Court Name: Supreme Court of Missouri
Date Published: Oct 15, 1852
Citation: 17 Mo. 329
Court Abbreviation: Mo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.