140 Mo. 191 | Mo. | 1897
This cause is here on what is usually termed a short transcript, that is a “certified copy of the record entry of the judgment,.together with the order granting the appeal.” R. S. 1889, sec. 2253.
The claim is made here that tivo judgments were entered in this cause in the lower court at the same term. A copy of the latter judgment has been certified to this court. The effect of the entry of this latter judgment was of course to set aside, vacate and abrogate the former one, though certainly this r'esult should have been .announced by a direct entry making such announcement.
The record recites that “plaintiffs by counsel except to setting aside judgment and to the modification of judgment heretofore entered.” But this entry on the record is no evidence whatever of the fact. The only way to preserve anything of that sort is to place and preserve it in a bill of exceptions, the only repository for things of that sort. Nichols v. Stevens, 123 Mo. loc. cit. 119; State v. Taylor, 134. Mo. loc. cit. 137. Therefore in absence of any showing in the bill of exceptions to the contrary, it will be presumed that plaintiffs acquiesced in the entry of the record judgment.
This case stauds on an entirely different footing to one where a demurrer is filed- to a pleading which is adjudged insufficient in law, and thereupon the pleader
There is no such showing made here in a bill of exceptions, and therefore judgment affirmed.