History
  • No items yet
midpage
Crete Mills v. Canfield
222 Mich. 458
Mich.
1923
Check Treatment
Clark, J.

Plaintiff is a Nebraska corporation. Following the filing of its declaration defendant moved to dismiss on the ground that plaintiff had not procured from the secretary of State a certificate of authority to carry on its business in the State of Michigan as required by statute. See Act No. 84, Pub. Acts 1921 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 9053 [164]). The cause was dismissed. Plaintiff brings error and had accompanying writ of certiorari.

The matter should have been pleaded and was not available upon a motion to dismiss. See Selznick Enterprises v. Garson Productions, 202 Mich. 106, 111; Vyse v. Richards, 208 Mich. 383; Pagenkoff v. *459Insurance Co., 197 Mich. 166, where the question is fully discussed.

The order of dismissal is set aside with costs to plaintiff. The cause is remanded.

Wiest, C. J., and Fellows, McDonald, Bird, Sharpe, Moore, and Steere, JJ., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Crete Mills v. Canfield
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 23, 1923
Citation: 222 Mich. 458
Docket Number: Docket No. 114
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.