Crawford v. State, 494 So. 2d 311

PER CURIAM.

This appeal has been reconsidered on remand from the supreme court. See Crawford v. State, 491 So.2d 1142 (Fla.1986).

We conclude that the error, discussed more fully by this court in Crawford v. State, 473 So.2d 700 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985), is harmless error. In determining that the error was harmless, we have applied the rigorous analysis required by State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986), and find the state has met its burden in proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the error did not affect the verdict.

AFFIRMED.

DOWNEY, GLICKSTEIN and STONE, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Crawford v. State

Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida

Date Published: Sep 24, 1986

Citations: 494 So. 2d 311; 11 Fla. L. Weekly 2037; 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 9784; No. 83-1322

Docket Number: No. 83-1322

Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.