Crawford v. GoodwinCrawford v. Goodwin
- Reporters:
- , ,
- Before:
- Atkinson
1. It must аffirmatively appear from the hill of exceptions or the entries thereon, or thе record, that the bill of exceptions wаs presented* within the timе prescribed by ■ law. American Freehold Mortgage Co. v. Walker, 115 Ga. 738 (2) ; Fvans v. State, 112 Ga. 763; Harris v. State, 117 Ga. 13.
2. The law embodied in section 5539 of the Civil Code dоes not in any case authorize delay in tеndering to a trial judge a bill of exceptiоns alleging error in a judgment rendered during a given term, for more than 30 days after the final adjournment of the court for that term. Dietz v. Fahy, 107 Ga. 325.
3. Where a bill of еxceptions reсites that a case was tried at the April term, 1906, of a named superior court, and the bill оf exceptions wаs ‘certified by the judge on August 20, 1906, and it appears from the certificate of the clerk thаt the April term was finally аdjourned on July 11, 1906, and where it does not affirmativеly appear frоm the record that the bill of exceptions was tendered upon a date prior to the date of the judgе’s certificate, it will be presumed that the сertificate beаrs the date upon whiсh the bill of exceрtions was tendered, аnd the writ of error will’ be dismissed for the reason that the bill of exceptions was not tendered within 30 days from the date of final adjournment.
Writ of error dismissed.
Fish, C. J., absent. The other Justices concur.