midpage

Cratch v. TaylorCratch v. Taylor

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Feb 28, 1962
22
Reporters:
, ,
Before:
WiNboene
Per Curiam.

The assignments of error purport to be supported by exceptions which appear nowhere in the record except ‍‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‍in the purported assignments of error. Such exceptions are ineffective and will not be considered on appeal. Holden v. Holden, 245 N.C. 1, 95 S.E. 2d 118. Even so, in the absence of any exceptions, or when ‍‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‍exceptions have not been preserved in accordance with the requirements of our Rules, the appeal will be taken as an exception to the judgment. An exception to the signing of the judgment presents nothing for ‍‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‍review except whether or not the court’s conclusion of law is supported by the finding or findings of fact; such exception does not challenge the correctness of any findings of fact. Logan v. Sprinkle, 256 N.C. 41, 123 ‍‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‍S.E. 2d 209.

When no exception has been taken to a finding of fact, such finding is presumed to be supported by competent evidence and is binding on appeal. Goldsboro v. RR., 246 N.C. 101, 97 S.E. 2d ‍‌‌​​‌‌​​‌‌​‌‌‌​‌‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​​‌​​​‌​​‌‌‌‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​​​​‌‌‌​​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​‌​​‌​​‌​‌‌​​‌‌​‌​​​‌​‍486.

In this case, the finding of the court below supports the judgment and it is

Affirmed.

WiNBOene, C.J., not sitting.

Case Details

Case Name: Cratch v. Taylor
Court Name: Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date Published: Feb 28, 1962
Citations: 256 N.C. 462; 124 S.E.2d 124; 1962 N.C. LEXIS 458; 22
Docket Number: 22
Court Abbreviation: N.C.
Log In