184 N.Y. 561 | NY | 1906
The only ground upon which the respondent moves for a re-argument, so far as I can learn from the moving papers, is that the court failed to pass upon the question of negligence.
I think the learned corporation counsel is mistaken in that contention. It will be seen from the report of the case (
CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, EDWARD T. BARTLETT, HAIGHT, VANN and WERNER, JJ., concur.
Motion denied. *562