History
  • No items yet
midpage
Crane v. Dwyer
9 Mich. 350
Mich.
1861
Check Treatment
Manning J.:

Equity will not lend itself to enforce a penalty or forfeiture, as it would do in giving the relief asked. The case made by the bill, is a forfeiture by one of defendants of all her rights in a contract made with complainant for the purchase of a lot of ground in the city of Detroit, and assigned to her. The house in question was built by the purchaser after he took possession of the lot; and complainant having put an end to the contract, for the non-payment of a part of the purchase money at the time stipulated, as by the terms of it he had a right to do, claims the house under the forfeiture, and asks an injunction to prevent its removal. The decree dismissing the bill must be affirmed.

The other Justices concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Crane v. Dwyer
Court Name: Michigan Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 19, 1861
Citation: 9 Mich. 350
Court Abbreviation: Mich.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.