History
  • No items yet
midpage
Crandall v. State
992 S.W.2d 345
Mo. Ct. App.
1999
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Appellant filed a pleading under Section 547.860, RSMo Supp.1997, seeking various relief pertaining to convictions of two counts of sodomy. Previous to the filing of this action, this Court had affirmed those convictions and affirmed the denial of a Rule 29.15 motion seeking to vacate the convictions.

In Schleeper v. State, 982 S.W.2d 252 (Mo.banc 1998), the Missouri Supreme Court held that Section 547.360 did not create a second and independent action, and if a previous post-conviction motion had been litigated, a valid post-conviction motion could not proceed under that statute. Schleeper is controlling on this Court, see Mo. Const, art. V, section 2, and requires affirmance of the trial court’s judgment dismissing Appellant’s claim.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Crandall v. State
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 11, 1999
Citation: 992 S.W.2d 345
Docket Number: No. 22220
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.