History
  • No items yet
midpage
Crandall v. Crandall
66 Pa. Super. 153
Pa. Super. Ct.
1917
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The libellant and respondent were married in December, 1910, when the husband was 75 and the wife 47 years of age. After living together in apparent amity for two years, the wife left the home, and has continuously remained separated from her husband. The justification for her withdrawal from the home is the controlling question in controversy. The testimony is very conflicting, and after a careful examination of the whole record we adopt the conclusion reached by the learned trial judge, dismissing the libel for the reasons he states in his opinion.

The decree is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Crandall v. Crandall
Court Name: Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 16, 1917
Citation: 66 Pa. Super. 153
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 363
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Super. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.