History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cramer v. Van Alstyne
9 Johns. 386
N.Y. Sup. Ct.
1812
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The case of Campbell v. Gumming (2 Burr. 1187.) is in point. Where an exec.ulion is returnable out of term, it is not void, though liable to be set aside, on motion, for irregularity. It may, therefore, be amended, though it would be otherwise as to mesne process. We grant the rule to amend, on payment of costs.

Motion granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Cramer v. Van Alstyne
Court Name: New York Supreme Court
Date Published: Oct 15, 1812
Citation: 9 Johns. 386
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. Sup. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.