History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cramer v. Akin
49 Mo. App. 163
Mo. Ct. App.
1892
Check Treatment
Biggs, J.

The respondent makes the point in his brief, that the bill of exceptions in this cause was filed out of time. The record shows that the motion for new trial was overruled on October 14, 1891, and that on that day leave was given the appellant to file bill of exceptions sixty days from that date. At the adjourned session of the same term, to-wit, December 11, 1891, the time for filing the bill was extended to December 27, 1891. No further extension is shown by the record. The bill was filed on the twenty-fifth day of January, 1892.

The errors assigned by the appellant pertain to matters of exception only, which could only be brought to our attention by a bill of exceptions filed within the time prescribed by order of court. As we are precluded from treating the bill of exceptions as a part of the record, and as the record proper is in no way challenged, the judgment of the circuit court must be affirmed.

All of the judges concur in the affirmance.

Case Details

Case Name: Cramer v. Akin
Court Name: Missouri Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 5, 1892
Citation: 49 Mo. App. 163
Court Abbreviation: Mo. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.