Crain v. StateCrain v. State
Jamie Crain raises several issues in this appeal of her sentence as a youthful offender for the offenses of uttering a forged check and robbery. We find merit only in her contention that the trial court failed to comply with
Crain was a juvenile at the time of the offenses but was transferred for adult prosecution pursuant to a direct-filed information.
Crain subsequently violated her commitment by running away from her halfway house. Following her apprehension, the trial court conducted a perfunctory hearing at which it merely revoked Crain‘s order of delinquency and sentenced her as a youthful offender for both offenses under
A youthful offender sentence is an adult sanction. Cooper v. State, 465 So.2d 1334 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). Consequently, before sentencing Crain as a youthful offender, the trial court was required to comply with
Reversed and remanded for resentencing.
FRANK, C.J., and ALTENBERND and LAZZARA, JJ., concur.