Craig v. State, 50 N.J.L. 176

Craig v. State

50 N.J.L. 176 | N.J. | 1887

Per Curiam.

The judgment in this ease should be affirmed, for the reasons given by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Dixon, Reed, Van Syckel, Beown, Clement, Mc-Geeooe, Pateeson, Whitaker. 10. For reversal — None.