History
  • No items yet
midpage
Craig v. Pellet
209 Ill. App. 368
Ill. App. Ct.
1918
Check Treatment
Mr. Justice O’Connor

delivered the opinion of the court.

5. Sales, § 252*—when no implied warranty as to fitness for purpose prior to Uniform Sales Act. Prior to the Uniform Sales Act of 1915 [Callaghan’s 1916 St. Supp. ¶ 1021(4) et seq.J, where the purchaser of a specified appliance did not rely on the judgment or skill of the seller hut was as familiar with the appliance as the seller, there was no implied warranty by the seller that the appliance was reasonably fit for the purpose for which it was bought.

Case Details

Case Name: Craig v. Pellet
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Jan 30, 1918
Citation: 209 Ill. App. 368
Docket Number: Gen. No. 23,276
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.