History
  • No items yet
midpage
Craig v. Craig
1 Call 483
Va. Ct. App.
1799
Check Treatment
PENDLETON, President.

Then- you suppose the words payment of money, in the act, to relate to the condition of the bond?

Wickham, yes.

PEE C TJE.

The judgment must be reversed; because “the bond on which the suit is brought, not being for the payment of money or tobacco, but with a condition for performance of covenants, was not, by law, assignable at the time the suit was commenced; which was, therefore, not maintainable by the assignee. ”

Judgment reversed, with costs; and judgment entered for the defendant.*

[* Henderson v. Hepburn, 2 Call, 232; Lewis v. Harwood, 6 Cran. 82; and Meredith’s adm’x. v. Duval, 1 Munf. 76.]

Case Details

Case Name: Craig v. Craig
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Virginia
Date Published: Apr 11, 1799
Citation: 1 Call 483
Court Abbreviation: Va. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.