History
  • No items yet
midpage
Craddock v. Craddock
90 Colo. 284
Colo.
1932
Check Treatment

MR. Justice Alter has not participated in the hearing or in the consideration of this cause. Chief Justice Adams and Justices Burke and Campbell are of the opinion that it should be affirmed, whereas Justices Butler, Moore and Hilliard are of the opinion that it should be reversed. As it must therefore be affirmed by operation of law because of an equally divided court, no good purpose would be served by a statement of the issues or the reasons for the conclusions of the several members of the court.

Judgment affirmed. *Page 286

Case Details

Case Name: Craddock v. Craddock
Court Name: Supreme Court of Colorado
Date Published: Feb 15, 1932
Citation: 90 Colo. 284
Docket Number: No. 12,720.
Court Abbreviation: Colo.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.