175 F. 303 | W.D. Tex. | 1909
By section 41a, cl. 4, of the Bankruptcy Act (Act July 1, 1898, c. 541, 30 Stat. 556 [U. S- Comp. St. 1901, p. 3437]), it'is provided:
“A person shall not in proceedings before a referee * * * refuse to appear after having been subpoenaed, or, upon appearing, refuse to take the, oath as a witness, or, having taken the oath, refuse to be examined according to law.”
And it is ftirthef provided, among other things, by section 41b, that:
“The referee shall certify the facts to’the judge, if any person shall do any of the things forbidden in this section,’.’ etc.
As it does not appear that the alleged bankrupt, Mrs. Kaufman, did any of the ’things forbidden by that part of the act quoted, the conclusion is quite evident that the certificate of the referee was not based upon that section of the act. It is equally clear that the certificate
The following language employed by Judge McPherson in the case of In re Reukauff, supra, is appropriate and pertinent in this immediate connection:
“I see no indication anywhere that the judge may be required to answer questions before the referee himself takes action.”
The certificate should be dismissed, and it is so ordered.
For other cases see same topic. & § number in Dec. & Am. Digs. 1907 to date, & Rep’r Indexes