78 N.J.L. 26 | N.J. | 1909
The opinion of the court was delivered by
A unanimous vote of all of the members of the board of health is not required by the statute, but only that the “resolution he unanimously adopted by the said board of health.” Granted, therefore, a hoard of health legally constituted and the adoption of the resolution, all present voting and none dissenting, and the statute has been complied with. This distinction is pointed out by Mr. Justice Fort in Crickenberger v. Westfield, 42 Vroom 467.
The ordinance brought up this writ, being based upon a certified opinion of the board of health that was itself improperly given, must be set aside.'