History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cox v. Rogers
30 Okla. 296
Okla.
1911
Check Treatment

The petition in error and transcript of the record was filed in this court on November 12, 1909. The plaintiff in error has failed to file any brief in the case. The petition in error shall therefore be dismissed for want of prosetion. Hass et al.v. McCampbell, 27 Okla. 290, 111 P. 543; Maddin v. McCormicket al., 27 Okla. 778, 117 P. 200; McClelland v. Witherall,infra, 119 P. 205; Bender v. Bender et al., infra,119 P. 205.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur. *Page 297

Case Details

Case Name: Cox v. Rogers
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Nov 18, 1911
Citation: 30 Okla. 296
Docket Number: 1213
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
    Cox v. Rogers, 30 Okla. 296