History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cox v. Hartranft
154 Pa. 457
Pa.
1893
Check Treatment
Per Curiam,

The defendant was a surety on a replevin bond. The defence set up in his affidavit rested on matters that were controverted in the action of replevin and settled by the verdict in that case. The learned judge was right in holding that they could not be now retried, and that the affidavit was insufficient.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Cox v. Hartranft
Court Name: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Apr 10, 1893
Citation: 154 Pa. 457
Docket Number: Appeal, No. 159
Court Abbreviation: Pa.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.