Cowenhoven v. Onderdonk

1 How. Pr. 58 | N.Y. Sup. Ct. | 1844

*59The court denied the motion, on the ground, among others, that although Onderdonk had informed Cowenhoven after he had bought the judgment that he had purchased it for him, still he could not compel him to assign; and also because Ullman the judgment creditor was the party, if any, to complain.

Decision.—Motion denied, with costs.