midpage

Coward v. StateCoward v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Mar 22, 1985
No. 84-1722
Versions:465 So. 2d 641
10 Fla. L. Weekly 768
1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13049
SCHEB, Judge.

Defendant pled nolo contendere to a charge of robbery with a firearm. The trial judge adjudicated the defendant guilty and sentenced him to seven years imprisonment with a three year mandatory sentence. Defendant was sentenced under the sentencing guidelines. The trial court retained jurisdiction over one-third of the defendant’s term under section 947.16(3), Florida Statutes (1983).

A trial court cannot retain jurisdiction over a defendant in cases in which the sentencing guidelines apply since parole is not available in such cases. Carter v. State, 464 So.2d 172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Accordingly, we affirm the defendant’s conviction and sentence but remand to the trial court to strike the retention of jurisdiction provision.

GRIMES, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Coward v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 22, 1985
Citations: 465 So. 2d 641; 10 Fla. L. Weekly 768; 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 13049; No. 84-1722
Docket Number: No. 84-1722
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In